The International Air Transport Association (IATA) released its latest financial outlook for the global airline industry showing a halving of profitability as a result of war-related Middle East disruptions and high fuel prices. The regional landscape, however, is highly differentiated. At the geographic center of the Middle East war, airlines in the Middle East are expected to collectively fall into the red with weak demand and operational disruptions. All other regions are expected to deliver profits, but at reduced levels from previous projections.
Highlights include:
“War-related disruptions in the Middle East and rising fuel costs have shifted the outlook for airlines to the worse. Globally, airlines are expected to see profitability halve compared to 2025. Profits will shrink from $45 billion in 2025 to $23 billion this year. And margins will shrink from 4.2% to 2.0%. All airline bottom lines are suffering from the rapid 70% rise in jet fuel prices. Some of the additional cost is being recuperated by adjusting prices and improving efficiency, but it will not be sufficient to maintain profitability at the previous year’s level. Smaller carriers that started the year with weak balance sheets are certainly struggling. At the regional level, all are in the black but with sharply reduced financial performance, with the exception of the Middle East. The Gulf carriers face operational uncertainty following a near complete shutdown of airspace at the outbreak of the war. These carriers are doing an amazing job maintaining connectivity, but major financial impacts are unavoidable,” said Willie Walsh, IATA’s Director General.
Even in the best of times, the airline industry as a whole suffers from low margins and returns below the cost of capital. The oil price shock has tested airline financial resilience as net margins have been squeezed to 2.0% globally.
“Airlines are bearing the brunt of the fuel price shock. While air fares are rising, airlines are still absorbing part of the hike in their bottom lines. Net profit per passenger is expected to fall to $4.50, half of what it was last year. Under the circumstances, that shows resilience. But it won’t even buy you a hot dog at most of the FIFA World Cup venues and it does not leave much of buffer should other costs or taxes start rising,” said Walsh.
Overall revenues are expected to grow by 9.4% to $1.165 trillion. Revenue per available tonne kilometer (ATK) is expected to grow by 8.8%. Outside of the extraordinary period of the COVID recovery, an increase of this magnitude only occurred recently in 2008, when the jet fuel price rose by 40% year-on-year, and in 2010, following the 2009 global financial crisis and subsequent jump in the price of jet fuel.
Despite significant improvements, revenue growth is expected to lag operating expense growth of 13% to $1.117 trillion, halving industry-wide net profitability to $23.0 billion in 2026.
Major macro-economic factors impacting airlines are expected to deteriorate in 2026 with GDP growth reducing to 2.5% (from 3.4% in 2025), inflation rising to 5.0% (from 4.1% in 2025), and world trade growth falling to 1.9% (from 4.6% in 2025).
Globally, airlines have hedged roughly one third of their expected fuel consumption for 2026, which helps smooth short-term cost volatility but does not eliminate exposure to sustained price increases. Furthermore, many airlines hedge against movement in crude oil prices, as this market is more liquid, which leaves them exposed to increases in the crack spread.
Total fuel consumption in 2026 is expected to remain unchanged from 2025, at 104 billion gallons. The rise in the price of jet fuel is therefore solely responsible for lifting the share of jet fuel in total operating expenses to 31.4% in 2026, up from 25.4% in 2025.
Airlines also bear the cost of compliance with the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), estimated to be between $1.2-1.6 billion, to offset CO2 emissions in the 28.8 Mt-81.5 Mt range.
The additional cost of airline purchases of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is expected to reach $4.3 billion in 2026 for an anticipated volume of 2.4 million tonnes of SAF being available (0.8% of total fuel consumption). This is slightly lower than previous estimates as the spread between jet fuel and SAF has dropped due to the appreciation of conventional fuel prices.
Airlines have so far been able to absorb a significant share of the missing capacity through a combination of operational and commercial adjustments. Airlines have extended the life of existing aircraft, increased daily utilization and operated at higher load factors, allowing them partially to offset the impact of delayed deliveries.
The shortage not only raises costs but also caps growth. Notably, the lack of new aircraft halted gains in fuel efficiency in 2024 and 2025 for the first time in history, eliminating the airline industry’s regular progress on reducing CO2 emissions. In the current environment, with additional geopolitical disruptions affecting global supply chains, the risk is that this imbalance becomes entrenched.
Africa’s hub carriers are seeing the strongest growth in traffic as it re-routes to avoid the Middle East. However, the region’s profitability is expected to weaken as a result of cost-side vulnerabilities, particularly regarding the supply and price of fuel. Combined with typically lower aircraft utilization and weaker balance sheets, these factors will cap the revenue upside from shifting traffic flows, resulting in a lower expected net profit margin in 2026.
Any gains are likely to be concentrated among the limited number of hub carriers with established connectivity linking Africa to Europe and Asia. Smaller and more fragmented operators are expected to bear the brunt of the challenging operating environment.
Structural constraints continue. Weak infrastructure, fragmented airspace, and limited cross-border coordination reduce network efficiency and raise operating costs. In addition, limited financial capacity and access to capital restrict fleet expansion and network development.
The Asia Pacific region relies heavily on crude oil imports from the Gulf and the lack of such supplies can cause more acute pressure on refineries and create jet fuel shortages as well as higher jet fuel prices than in other regions. This environment is already prompting capacity adjustments, and longer routings, caused by airspace restrictions, lead to increased fuel burn, tighter effective capacity, and higher unit costs.
Demand fundamentals remain supportive with both domestic and international passenger traffic continuing to grow. In fact, some Asia Pacific carriers are benefitting from shifting traffic flows linked to the Middle East conflict, particularly on Europe–Asia routes. Cost pressures are amplified by the depreciation of several Asian currencies, which raises the local currency cost of US dollar-denominated expenses, most notably fuel.
Disruptions at Middle Eastern hubs have created additional opportunities for Asia-based carriers to capture cargo traffic, particularly on Europe–Asia trade lanes. However, regulatory changes in Europe, including tighter customs requirements for low-value shipments, may weigh on e-commerce volumes. Overall, while cargo growth is likely to moderate, capacity constraints and rerouting effects should keep market conditions relatively tight.
Highly reliant on Gulf imports for jet fuel, Europe is facing significant cost pressure. While some of this is mitigated thanks to a pre-crisis hedging ratio of 70% of its fuel needs, higher costs will feed through as hedges roll off.
Europe has seen some traffic gains by providing direct connectivity between Europe and Asia, replacing some travel through Gulf hubs. However, parts of Europe are still suffering from airspace restrictions over Russia. Importantly, a weakening macro-economic backdrop, with slower growth and rising energy costs, is expected to weigh on household purchasing power.
European airlines operate with cost pressures from onerous regulations, including SAF mandates, as well as elevated airport and air navigation charges. Ongoing industrial actions in several markets contribute to operational disruption and limit flexibility. These factors suggest that Europe’s competitive position could weaken yet further, even once market conditions normalize.
Latin America’s performance is influenced by the downward pressure on several of the region’s currencies resulting from the energy crisis.
Demand conditions in Latin America remain more sensitive than in other regions, reflecting lower income levels, and a lower share of business travel in total demand for air transport. Cargo markets may soften, particularly in export-oriented markets. Structural demand drivers remain in place, however, suggesting a gradual rather than an abrupt adjustment.
Latin American airlines typically operate with limited balance sheet flexibility and higher funding costs, which restrict their ability to absorb shocks or invest in fleet and network expansion. The EBIT to net margin ratio is about four times the global average underscoring this constraint which limits airlines’ capacity to respond dynamically to shifts in demand or cost conditions. The combination of these factors suggests that the region is likely to experience a more pronounced slowdown in growth, even if demand remains positive overall.
Sitting at the center of the shock from the war in the Middle East, the region is expected to generate a net loss in 2026. Capacity reductions, flight cancellations, operational disruptions, and elevated fuel prices are all pushing up operating expenses. Meanwhile the loss of transfer traffic is weighing on load factors and raising unit costs.
Several structural features support resilience in the region. These include a more favorable tax environment, relatively secure access to fuel supply, and comparatively low financial leverage. Moreover, its geographic position, established infrastructure, and dense network underpin long-term success.
Cargo markets in the region are also under pressure. Disruptions have reduced effective capacity and triggered a reallocation of transit cargo traffic toward other regions, weighing on financial performance.
The immediate recovery path is likely to be driven more by pricing than by a rapid return of volumes. In the longer term, structural advantages should support a recovery in traffic, although potentially at lower margins, which could reshape the economics of the hub-based model.
As North American airlines have largely moved away from fuel hedging, jet fuel cost increases are transmitted more directly and rapidly into the region’s airlines’ cost bases. This creates strong incentives for immediate pricing responses to cover rapidly rising costs.
Network carriers appear better positioned than low-cost operators to deal with domestic market softness. Low cost carriers are more exposed to domestic demand and typically lack a meaningful premium offering, limiting their ability to offset cost pressures through upselling and fare segmentation.
North American airlines have delivered strong profitability in recent years and are relatively isolated from the operational shocks in the Middle East. Financial leverage, however, is comparatively high, increasing sensitivity to cost shocks, even as operating performance remains solid. Additionally, labor costs are elevated following recent wage increases.
Overall, North America is likely to see a predominantly price-driven adjustment, with widening segmentation between resilient network carriers and more constrained low-cost operators.
Air travel continues to deliver exceptional value to consumers. While airfares have unavoidably risen in response to higher fuel prices, the average real return air fares (in US dollars, including ancillaries) are expected to be $462, which would be 26.3% lower than in 2016.
An IATA public opinion poll conducted in April 2026 (15 countries, 6,500 respondents who have taken at least one trip in the past year) revealed that 97% of travelers expressed satisfaction with their last travel experience. Moreover, 88% agreed that air travel makes their lives better, 79% agreed that air travel is good value for money, 81% said they have lots of choices when shopping for air travel, and 88% said they cared about their ability to fly in future.
Passengers are counting on a safe, sustainable, efficient, and profitable airline industry. The IATA public opinion polling demonstrated the important role that travelers see the airline industry playing:
The air transport industry is committed to its goal of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Travelers are expressing high levels of confidence in this endeavor with 80% agreeing that the industry is demonstrating commitment to work together to achieve its ambitious goal, 76% agreeing that aviation leaders are taking the climate challenge seriously and 78% saying that they believe we will be able to fly sustainably.
The survey also revealed that traveler confidence remains high even with a proliferation of conflicts, including war. Overall, 41% said they were planning to travel more in the coming 12 months than in the previous 12 months (with an additional 52% indicating plans to travel at the same level). Some 91% said that flying is safe, with 85% saying it is safer today than ever. Travelers want to be informed with 86% saying they check government travel advisories when booking, 84% saying they are researching more before travel, 81% indicating that they are concerned about disruptions due to geopolitical conflict, and 71% saying they are booking closer to the date of travel to avoid surprises. Nonetheless, 68% indicated that they have not changed their travel habits at all.